requestId:68753c2f5557a6.34495326.
Yang Guorong: How can “specific learning” be enough?
Accessor: Yang Guorong
Accessor: Rong Lin
Source: “Man prints newspaper information” Humanities WeChat Public Number
Time: Confucius was in the 2575th year of Jiachen month 9th day Dingchou
� href=”https://www.taiwanblog.net/Amber/%e7%95%b6%e5%80%8b%e8%a2%ab%e5%8c%85%e9%a4%8a%e7%9a%84%e4%b8%ab%e9%a0%ad/”>大官网发官网发官网发官网发官网发官网发官网发官网彩发官网彩发官网彩发官网彩发官网彩官The report selected 10 examples of the original academic managers of Chinese philosophy and social science, namely, “State governance theory”, “Combined management theory of state-owned enterprises”, “Five discussions on engineering philosophy”, “Modern Chinese literature”, “Social theory theory of international politics”, “New structure economy”, “Academic ‘full evaluation’ system”, “Detailed shape learning”, “Peripheral propagation theory”, and “Benevolent institution theory”.
The Confucius Institute public number specially reprinted the articles taught by Mr. Rong Lin from the China National Library of China’s National Library of China, and introduced to us the connotation, characteristics and structure of its original academic discussion.
character hand-tip:
Yang Guorong, a senior professor of Huadong Teachers, dean of the Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, director of the Chinese Institute of Modern Thought and Civilization, and director of the School Academic Committee, the Ministry of Education’s Key Research Base for Humanities and Social Sciences. Director of Zhejiang Ma Yifu School of Education, a lecturer of the Southeast Teachers’ Model School, and a member of the fifth and sixth Philosophy Department Review of the National Academy of Sciences. The important research leaders include Chinese philosophy, Chinese and Western philosophy, ethics, metaphysics, etc., and have published more than 20 books on academic works, many of which have been translated into English, French, and Korean. They have published books on Indian University Press, Brill, etc. Important academic and part-time positions include the President of the International Metaphysical Society (ISM), the Academician of the International Academy of Philosophy (IIP), the former President of the International Chinese Philosophy (ISCP) (2019-2022), the President of the Chinese Philosophy History Association, etc.
Question: href=”https://twsweetsugar99.org/”>BaozhuangHello, Teacher Yang, I wish you the first time to express the theory of “specific shape learning” in 2011 to be selected as the “original academic research” in China. Can you introduce the connotation and characteristics of this theory to the master?
——In modern times, especially after entering the 20th century, philosophy seems to be increasingly professionalizing and professionalizing, and philosophers are becoming more and more agile as they are doubtful, difficult and rejecting metaphysical studies. href=”http://twlovediary.com/”>彩票 “Expert”, the various fields of philosophy, also reaches a clear or even a chaotic wall. Philosophy itself, at a relatively high level, flows from “Tao” to “technical” and moves from the thought of cleverness to technical knowledge, which leads to the intellectualization and forgetfulness of philosophy. Focusing on metaphysical learning means a return to wisdom. “Definitely shaped learning” is based on the assessment of the “thing” thinking in Chinese traditional philosophy, and abandons traditional metaphysics and modern thinking metaphysics and emotions. The “thing” mentioned here refers to the existence that originates from people’s knowledge and action activities, structures and develops in the actual process of people’s life. The characteristic of thinking and metaphysical learning is to ignore the “thing”: if thinking and metaphysical learning is based on the heart and ignore the “thing”, then the metaphysical learning of emotions will place real “things” with logical emotions. Through the multi-dimensional assessment of “things”, the theory has demonstrated the unique approach of real existence, and through the modern thinking metaphysics and the metaphysics of emotion, metaphysics directed by real existence can be extended in the new form.
The important content and theoretical characteristics can be described in my specialty “People and the World: Viewing through Things”. This book is the latest book on “Syntax Learning”. It reflects my thoughts compared to it. Its characteristic is that it has different ideas from the past on the nature of people and the world and how to master objects. Just master the worldIn terms of the real approach and methods of the world, the demand divides the original world and the real world. When there is no real relationship with people, it is presented with its original emotions. Once people are influenced by different emotions and make them form multiple connections with people, they will actually begin to gain real forms. The actual influence of people is specifically expressed as a variety of “things”, and the real world is structured by the differences made by people. As the existence of its original form, the world can be seen as the world of the person. As far as the real world is based on the “things” done by people, people undoubtedly present the meaning of guidance here. People influence “things” through “things”, thereby transforming the original things into facts in the sense of cognition and intrinsic theory. From then on, the real world based on “things” is first related to things. As a human activity, “thing” is ultimately directed by the value goal of realizing people. In this sense, the real world based on “thing” not only concerns facts, but also includes the value.
The “presence” of the world is difficult to separate from the existence of human beings. The real world is born from “things”, and people themselves are also here because of “things”. As a human’s broad activities, “things” not only develop in the entire process of human existence, but also lies in all aspects of human existence. People have different ways of “doing” and their forms of “things” are different. While changing things from “things”, people also form and develop mastering the world. The talent of the world and thus gradually recognize the object world. Differences in talents show the situation, the physical condition of the disagreement or the process. People who are with “things” are based on their talents and include moral character at the value level, which specifically expresses virtue. The process of achieving the world with “things” is not only related to the development of talents, but also to the cultivation of virtue. From the subject of acting or dealing with things, the completion of “things” is not only related to the body of the subject (the body of reason) but also to its mind (inner consciousness); it not only requires the subject’s sensual awareness, but also does not have the participation of its emotions. Based on the “things” done by people, the body and mind, sensibility and emotion, knowledge and actions are integrated with each other, and the person himself moves towards a real and specific existence in this unity.
From the “presence” of the world, the birth of the world, the existence of human beings and the innateness of human beings, the interaction between mind and matter becomes an unavoidable aspect. From the perspective of philosophical history, the dualism of mind and matter actually understands “mind” and “object” in a separate way. The theory of divergent situations tends to eliminate the difference between mind and matter, and both of them are difficult to grasp the fairness of the relationship between mind and matter. How to defeat the above domain in the relationship between mind and matter? Here the same needs lead to “things”. As the activity that people do, “things” are related to “things” and also to “heart”: the process of storing thingsNot only do they face and deal with “things”, they are also a furry little guy, holding them in a terrible way, their eyes closed and always include the participation of the “heart” and are constrained by the “heart”. The “heart” and “things” are related to each other through “things”. Taking “things” as the source, “heart” and “things” interact with each other, and “heart” appears in “things” (the “things” transformed into “things”) with different emotions. “things” continue to enter “the heart” TC:
發佈留言